Divorce Navigator
McKenzie Friend · Divorce Support
divorcenavigator.uk
Financial Remedy Proceedings

Think your ES1 only needs three dates? That could cost you at your FDA.

Marriage, separation, filing — that's the header. What goes in the Issues section is what actually protects your case.

The FDA

What is the First Directions Appointment?

The FDA is the first court hearing in financial remedy proceedings. The judge does not decide who gets what.

The court defines the issues and gives directions — what documents to disclose, what questions to answer, what valuations are needed, and what timetable the case follows.

Everything that happens after flows from what the judge was shown at it.

The risk

Miss something at the FDA and it may be gone for good

Get it right

  • Right evidence ordered
  • Right questions asked
  • Right valuations directed
  • Case moves efficiently

Miss it

  • Key issues uninvestigated
  • Evidence never obtained
  • Too late to go back
  • Case decided on gaps
The law

Your ES1 is your chronology — but "concise" doesn't mean empty

"Filing the composite ES1 satisfies the court's requirement to file a concise statement of issues and chronology."

The header dates are the starting point, not the whole picture.

Complex facts belong in the Issues section and your position statement — not left out altogether.

The gap

When the ES1 alone leaves the judge in the dark

Facts the ES1 misses

  • Disputed separation date
  • Assets sold or dissipated
  • Property transaction chain
  • Business assets in dispute

Patterns it cannot show

  • Financial support withdrawn
  • Cash replaced by transfers
  • Money moved to third parties
  • Unexplained asset changes
The FDR

Why the FDA evidence base shapes everything at FDR

Hearing 1
FDA
Evidence
Gathered
Hearing 2
FDR
If no deal
Final hearing

At the FDR, the judge gives a non-binding indication based only on the evidence before them. If FDA directions were thin, that indication is built on gaps — leading to a bad settlement or a final hearing with the same missing evidence.

Know this

Don't mistake "concise" for "complete"

The ES1 is designed to be brief — but brief isn't the same as blank.

If a property sale, a disputed date, or a pattern of dissipation matters to your case, it needs to be flagged as an issue and properly explained in your position statement.

Getting it right

What you can do as a litigant in person

Do this

  • Flag it in the Issues box
  • Expand it in your position statement
  • Cross-reference the bundle
  • Keep it concise but clear

Avoid this

  • Leaving it out entirely
  • Assuming the judge already knows
  • Waiting until FDR to raise it
  • Burying it in a lengthy narrative

Know your ES1. Know your case.

Filing your ES1 correctly satisfies the court's chronology requirement — but only if the real issues in your case are properly flagged and explained. Get it right from the FDA, and the evidence base you build shapes everything that follows.

Facing a First Directions Appointment and not sure where to start?

Get support with your FDA →
1 / 9